HOT PETITION! Defend DOMA & Constitutional Amendment defining Marriage between One Man, One Woman. Select, sign, WE WILL FAX your petition to 435 Congressmen & 100 Senators. We delivered 103,000 fax petitions. Can you help reach 150,000?
Victory! House votes to defend Traditional Marriage in Court
We have another victory to report. After YOU helped fax over 100,000 petitions to Congress in 2012, the new Congress just voted to FUND the legal defense of the 1996 Defense of Marriage Act in court. In a 228-196 vote, almost all Republicans voted to do what President Obama refuses to do, enforce the law defining marriage as one man plus one woman.
The homose xual newspaper Washington Blade complained: “Republicans will take the extraordinary measure of including an authorization of their efforts to defend DOMA in the Rules of the House of Representatives and by doing so, continue to spend taxpayer funds, already adding up to $1.7 million, in their attempts to defend this [ … ] law in federal courts and the Supreme Court.”
The move is exactly what we asked Congress for, and just in time as two traditional marriage cases will soon be heard by the U.S. Supreme Court. (Details below.)
Let’s take a stand for traditional marriage = one man + one woman, this time by petitioning all 100 Senators to follow the example of the House…
Forget SCOTUS. Congress “evolving” on homose xual “marriage.” Take action.
While I am encouraged the conservative-leaning Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) has taken up two homose xual ‘marriage’ cases for 2013 (California Prop 8 and federal ‘marriage’ DOMA benefits cases), I am alarmed that two news stories here and here suggest the U.S. Congress is “evolving” to the left and may soon vote on whether to repeal the 1996 Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA).
If President Obama can strong-arm Speaker John Boehner (R-OH) on the fiscal-cliff talks, how soon before Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) forces a vote, or adds a poison-pill amendment to homose xualize marriage? ABC News reports: “Back then, about 31 percent of the country supported same-sex marriage, and not one state allowed it. Today, 51 percent of Americans support it, and it’s legal in nine states and the District of Columbia.”
Strangely both liberals and conservatives agree, if the SCOTUS uphold DOMA, then the only way to repeal DOMA will be through an Act of Congress, which Obama seeks.
ABC reports before Obama endorsed gay ‘marriage,’ “he had directed his Justice Department to stop defending DOMA in court, believing that the issue belonged to the states. As such, House Republican leaders tapped lawyer Paul Clement to defend the law.
“Edward Whelan, president of the conservative Ethics and Public Policy Center, is careful to separate the legal debate regarding DOMA from the change in public opinion.
“The constitutional status of DOMA shouldn’t be affected at all by any change in public opinion on same-sex marriage,” the DOMA supporter says. “Supporters of same-sex marriage are free to try to revise DOMA legislatively.” [This from a conservative.]
[Dr. Chaps comment: Revise DOMA legislatively? Don’t think they won’t try. We MUST continue to petition Congress, 1) to defend DOMA in court, and 2) to defeat repeal efforts.]
Chaplain quotes Jesus, gets 3 death threats from angry homose xuals
Friends, I need your prayers and support this week. Three times this week I received death threats from angry homosexuals saying “You’re going to hang, Nazi!” and “You’re going to burn in hell, you disgusting, fake Christian, Nazi. You know nothing about Jesus. You’re a disgusting parasitic Nazi. You’re going to burn in hell.” I have posted a recording of one angry lady here.
The violent woman did not leave her name or phone number, so I can’t yet trace the calls, which occur daily at 2 or 3pm for three days in a row. This isn’t the first time either. I usually ignore anonymous emails, but I get dozens of such threats every year.
What did I do to deserve such “love” and “tolerance” from their community? As a Chaplain, I quoted Jesus Christ and the Bible (Matthew 7 and Romans 1) in a TV interview that is now going viral in over 40 pro-homose xual blogs, listed here, including The Advocate. My video interview with David Pakman is posted on YouTube and has gone viral with 5,000 hits in the first 24 hours.
Standing up for Jesus and traditional marriage can cause suffering. Who will stand with me? If you’re able to please donate to our non-profit ministry this week, (from which I’ve never taken a penny of salary since I founded this in 1999), please donate here.
Then please sign our petition to Congress again, for traditional marriage:
Chaplain’s hot TV interview makes waves in homose xual world (video)
Friends, remember that the 1996 Defense of Marriage Act is under fire in the U.S. Senate, where Diane Feinstein (D-CA) has 32 co-sponsors to force homose xual “marriage” upon all 50 states. Like he did with the “hate crimes” bill, Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) knows how to attach such repeal to the Pentagon Budget, to hijack our troops pay, unless the House concedes to re-define marriage nationwide.
Today I gave one controversial news interview on the David Pakman TV show, that is already making waves in the homose xual world, with 3 major bloggers attacking me, here, here, and here. Today I already received a threatening phone-call from a homosexual who wants me to “burn in hell” because I quoted the Bible.
What did I say that caused such a stir? I simply quoted the Bible twice, from Matthew 7 and Romans 1. Please take a moment to watch my interview fully, here. (Or click the image –>)
Then I wonder if you would take a moment (again) to sign our instant fax-petition to all 100 Senators and all 435 Congressmen, to protect and defend the 1996 DOMA law that defines marriage as only valid between one man and one woman.
Breaking: Appeals Court: “Defense of Marriage Act Unconstitutional.” Take action!
As if our founding fathers wrote sod omy protections into the Constitution, the liberal 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals ruled 2-1 to force homose xual ‘marriage’ benefits upon the federal government, perhaps in all 50 states, striking down the 1996 Defense of Marriage Act.
Reuters reports: “A U.S. appeals court in New York on Thursday ruled that a U.S. law defining marriage as a union between a man and a woman unconstitutionally denies federal benefits to lawfully married same-sex couples.
“The 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals is now the second federal appeals court to reject part of the Defense of Marriage Act. It upheld a lower court ruling that had found a central part of the law unconstitutional.
“Appeals in several cases are currently pending before the U.S. Supreme Court, which could choose to take up the issue in its current term.
“Two members of a three-judge panel ruled in favor of Edith Windsor, an 83-year-old [lesbian] who argued that the law discriminates against gay couples in violation of the U.S. Constitution.
“They found that gays and lesbians are entitled to heightened protection from the courts, based on the history of discrimination the group has suffered.
“Homosexuals are not in a position to adequately protect themselves from the discriminatory wishes of the majoritarian public,” Judge Dennis Jacobs wrote for the majority.
[Dr. Chaps’ comment: Now lesbians get homose xual “bonus pay” from YOUR taxes. Who thinks President Obama or AG Eric Holder will help appeal this to the Supreme Court? THEY WON’T. That’s why we MUST petition Congress to defend the 1996 Defense of Marriage Act, and appeal NOW to the Supreme Court.]
Obama forces homose xual “marriage” at Supreme Court
It wasn’t enough that President Obama’s campaign web-site replaced the 9/11 memorial with a “gay flag” and fundraising appeals to homosexuals, but more importantly…
Now Obama’s Department of Injustice and Attorney General Eric Holder have violated federal law by appealing two more homose xual “marriage” cases to the Supreme Court. (That makes 4 total.)
Reuters reports: “The U.S. Department of Justice on Tuesday asked the Supreme Court to consider two additional legal challenges to a federal law that defines marriage as between a man and a woman, after submitting similar cases for review in July.”
“The two petitions filed by the department urge the high court to consider at least one gay marriage case in the near future to determine whether Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act violates legally married same-sex couples’ rights by treating them differently than heterosexual couples.”
In other words, Obama wants YOUR tax-payer dollars redistributed as “sod omite bonus pay” for unmarried couples who violate the 1996 Defense of Marriage Act. And DOJ spends your tax dollars sending federal lawyers to defend this?
We must continue to petition Congress to defend traditional marriage. Let’s fax all 435.
Court enforces Homose xual Bonus Pay & “Marriage” upon 4 States and the USA
The First Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled to enforce homose xual ‘marriage’ upon the federal government and four states, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampsire, Rhode Island, (and Puerto Rico). Read ruling here.
In a 3-0 ground breaking decision, WSJ reports (with a nice summary and select quotes from the bad ruling): “Judge Michael Boudin, an appointee of President George H.W. Bush, authored the unanimous decision. He was joined by Judge Sandra Lynch,a Clinton appointee, and Chief Judge Juan Torruella, a Reagan appointee.”
The judges struck down the 1996 Defense of Marriage Act as unconstitutional under the 10th and 14th Amendments. “Congress’ denial of federal benefits to same-sex couples lawfully married in Massachusetts has not been adequately supported by any permissible federal interest,” they wrote (as if the founding fathers wanted homose xual federal benefits?)
Sadly, neither the 10th Amendment nor the 14th Amendment authorize “homose xual bonus pay” with your federal tax dollars as this court imagines. The 10th Amendment protects states rights, but would never enforce a non-existent Massachusetts case-law (written by left-wing judges and enforced by then Governor Mitt Romney) upon a federal agency such as the U.S. Post Office. The 14th Amendment protects equality based upon race, but never promotes voluntary choice of immoral sexual preference.
Judicial activism has run overboard. It’s time for Congress to pass a Constitutional Amendment that defines marriage as only valid between one man and one woman, as Jesus defined marriage in Matthew 19. Please help me petition Congress today…
DEMOCRATS IN U.S. SENATE INTRODUCE BILL TO REPEAL 1996 DOMA LAW
While the national media covers only the debt crisis, Democrats in the Senate are attacking traditional marriage between one man and one woman, by attempting to repeal the 1996 Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA). Not satisfied with homosexualizing the military, or forcing gay “marriage” in states like New York, radical homosexuals testified on Capitol Hill today demanding homosexual “bonus pay” with more than 1,100 federal benefits that reward their acts of sod omy in all 50 states, taxing heterosexuals more to pay homosexuals to engage in immorality.
On Tuesday Senator Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) introduced, and President Obama quickly endorsed a new bill S.598 to promote homosexual marriage, mislabeled the “Respect for Marriage Act” (RFMA) to end federal law that defines traditional marriage between one man and one woman. White House press secretary Jay Carney told reporters Tuesday “President Obama is proud to support the Respect for Marriage Act,” which disrespects traditional marriage by enforcing homosexual marriage upon all 50 states. His views are no longer “evolving” rather Obama is now fully out of the closet promoting gay marriage nationwide.
At last week’s hearings 5 pro-homosexual witnesses and just 3 conservatives argued for and against repealing DOMA, and passing RFMA, including 2 high-profile gay activists, Joe Solmonese, president of the Human Rights Campaign, and Evan Wolfson, founder and executive director of Freedom to Marry. Joining them will be Susan Murray, an activist attorney from Vermont, and complainers Ron Wallen of California and Andrew Sorbo of Connecticut, both of whom were denied homosexual bonus pay, and bonus Social Security checks (funded by heterosexual tax-payers) when their homosexual “marriage” partners died.
Testifying in favor of keeping DOMA intact were pro-marriage heroes Ed Whelan, president of the Ethics and Public Policy Center, Austin Nimocks, senior legal counsel for the Alliance Defense Fund, and Tom Minnery, senior vice president of government and public policy for Focus on the Family.
44 States have passed laws like DOMA defining marriage between one man and one woman, but if RFMA is passed and the federal DOMA law repealed, all 44 state laws could be in danger of being overturned in court. Just imagine Texas, Oklahoma, Kentucky, Mississippi, etc. being forced to issue homosexual “marriage” licenses, or forced to recognize and pay your tax benefits to homosexuals “married” in New York.
Let’s take a stand, by petitioning all 100 Senators to defend DOMA, and reject RFMA.
Friends, our nation will soon endorse homosexual “marriage” in all 50 states, if your Senator doesn’t take a stand to defend DOMA, since Obama won’t. Let’s take a stand today, and demand Senators defend the 1996 DOMA law in court.
God Bless you, in Jesus’ name,
Chaplain Gordon James Klingenschmitt, PhD
For media interviews, select here.
P.S. Time is urgent! Court cases in Connecticut, Massachusetts, and elsewhere are already failing because Obama and AG Holder refuse to defend the law. Please sign our petition today! Prefer to donate by mail? Please mail paper check or money orders to: The Pray In Jesus Name Project, PO Box 77077, Colorado Springs, CO 80970.
